Label AI content and clarify rights of use
Media companies label AI-generated content and clarify rights of use
Fits: Marketing & communications · Legal & compliance · Creative & media production · Social media & content
For every piece of content, it is clear where AI was involved, whether and how this is labelled, and whether the rights to the source material and the result are sufficient. You avoid misleading people, cease-and-desist letters and a loss of trust among your audience.
Is this for you?
- Your newsroom or production team uses AI for texts, translations, images, voices or video editing.
- Today it is unclear or inconsistent when you label AI use.
- You work with licensed material from agencies, photographers or archives.
Write down six examples from your production in which AI was involved, without names and without real pieces, and use the template below to classify them against your house rule and the principles of the AI Act. Note where your house rule gives no answer.
How to go about it
- Set a house rule for labelling and rights
- Record AI use for each piece
- Set up mandatory fields and check reminders in the editorial system
- Pass borderline cases to the duty editor and the legal department
- Label, publish and give reasons for the decision
- Adapt the house rule to the legal situation and audience questions
Templates to copy
The complete guide
- 6 steps explaining exactly what to do
- 3 proven templates to copy into your own AI
- Safe use: data, checking, deciding, informing
- Pitfalls, effort and how to recognise success
With the training you get all 430 guides for as long as your access runs.
Same approach, other use cases
13 more use cases follow the pattern “Checking & moderating content”.
G-MK-03 · Legal status 08.10.2026